Doomsday Clock Ticks Closer to Midnight

The Doomsday ClockImage courtesy of the <a href="">Bulletin of Atomic Scientists</a>.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS) moved its Doomsday Clock one minute closer to midnight on Tuesday. It now reads 11:55 p.m.

Two years ago, when it appeared that world leaders might actually address the global threats around us, the BAS ratcheted the clock backward by a minute, to 11:54pm.

Now that petite burst of optimism has dissolved.


It’s mostly about the global failure deal with climate change.

Specifically, according to the BAS:

“The challenges to rid the world of nuclear weapons, harness nuclear power, and meet the nearly inexorable climate disruptions from global warming are complex and interconnected.”  
  • We’re near the point of no return in efforts to prevent catastrophic atmospheric changes
  • Unless we build alternative technologies in the next five years, we’re doomed to a warmer climate, harsher weather, droughts, famine, water scarcity, rising sea levels, loss of island nations, and increasing ocean acidification
  • Fossil-fuel burning power plants and infrastructure built in 2012-2020 will produce energy and emissions for 40 to 50 years 
  • Russia, China, India, and South Korea will likely continue to construct nuclear power plants, enrich fuel, and shape the global nuclear power industry 
  • Vietnam, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and others, are still intent on acquiring civilian nuclear reactors for electricity despite the Fukushima disaster

Better news on this front:

  • Solar and photovoltaic technologies are getting cheaper
  • Wind turbines are being adopted commercially
  • Energy conservation and efficiency are becoming accepted as sources for industrial production and residential use
  • Many of these developments are taking place at municipal and local levels:
“The political processes in place seem wholly inadequate to meet the challenges to human existence that we confront.”

The BAS scientists note:

As we see it, the major challenge at the heart of humanity’s survival in the 21st century is how to meet energy needs for economic growth in developing and industrial countries without further damaging the climate, without exposing people to loss of health and community, and without risking further spread of nuclear weapons.


Credit: Savantpol via Wikimedia Commons.Credit: Savantpol via Wikimedia Commons.

Other issues worrying the BAS include nuclear disarmament:

  • The path toward a world free of nuclear weapons is not clear and leadership is failing

  • It’s still possible for radical groups to acquire and use highly enriched uranium and plutonium to wreak havoc in nuclear attacks

  • Disagreements between the US and Russia about missile defense, and insufficient cooperation among the nine nuclear weapons states is creating distrust that is leading nearly all nuclear weapons states to hedge their bets by modernizing their nuclear arsenals

  • Ambiguity about Iran’s nuclear power program continues to be the most prominent problem

  • The potential for nuclear weapons use in regional conflicts in the Middle East, Northeast Asia, and particularly in South Asia is alarming, and ongoing efforts to ease tensions, deal with extremism and terrorist acts, and reduce the role of nuclear weapons in international relations have had only halting success  

Credit: World Nuclear Association via Wikimedia Commons.Credit: World Nuclear Association via Wikimedia Commons.

And the BAS is also concerned about nuclear energy:

  • The Fukushima disaster raised significant questions needing to be addressed
  • Safer nuclear reactor designs need to be developed and built, and more stringent oversight, training, and attention are needed to prevent future disasters
  • A major question: How can complex systems like nuclear power stations be made less susceptible to accidents and errors in judgment?



Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend