Pew Survey Suggests Gingrich’s Vision For Immigration Reform Could Legalize Millions

Newt Gingrich speaks at the Western Republican Leadership Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada.<a target="_blank" href=""> Flickr/Gage Skidmore</a>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

GOP presidential contender Newt Gingrich’s front-runner status has thus far managed to survive the revelation that he doesn’t believe mass deportation is a workable solution to illegal immigration. 

“I do not believe that the people of the United States are going to take people who have been here a quarter century, who have children and grandchildren, who are members of the community, who may have done something 25 years ago, separate them from their families, and expel them,” Gingrich said during a GOP presidential debate on CNN last week. “And I’m prepared to take the heat for saying let’s be humane in enforcing the law without giving them citizenship, but by finding a way to create legality so that they are not separated from their families.”

The Pew Hispanic Center decided to break down what Gingrich’s plan might mean in practice. According to their survey, first flagged by the New York Times, almost two-thirds of the US’ 10.2 million adult illegal immigrants have lived here for at least a decade, and nearly half have kids who are minors. The survey also notes, “Overall, at least 9 million people are in ‘mixed-status’ families that include at least one unauthorized adult and at least one US-born child.”

It’s unclear whether “been here for 25 years and has kids” is exactly the criteria for immigrants to whom Gingrich is prepared to offer relief, but the Pew survey suggests millions might be eligible even under those terms. And any solution involving “millions” is probably way more than the immigration restrictionist GOP base is willing to support. 

In the past, Gingrich has been able to thread the needle between advocating immigration reform policies that border on plausible and using inflammatory rhetoric to insulate himself from conservative criticism. For instance, on Thursday in Iowa, Gingrich signed a pledge to build a southern border fence by 2013. Ironically, according to the Pew survey, the large number of unauthorized immigrants in the US who have been here for a long time and have reared families is the result of the fact that “the inflow [of immigrants] has slowed down significantly in recent years, as the US economy has sputtered and border enforcement has tightened.” Even Gingrich probably can’t get away with saying that during a GOP debate. 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend