Supreme Court Declines to Halt Execution of Texas Inmate Duane Buck

<a href="">Rick Perry</a>/Flickr

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

On Monday, the US Supreme Court rejected a writ of certiorari to reconsider the case of Texas death row inmate Duane Buck, meaning that unless the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles intervenes (it hasn’t in the past) Buck’s execution will continue as planned.

Buck was sentenced to death in 1997 for the murder of his ex-girlfriend and a male acquaintance, but while he freely admits to his guilt, the point of contention is how his death sentence was obtained. The prosecutor in the case relied in part on the testimony of a defense-summoned psychologist who argued that Buck’s race (he’s black) made him more likely to commit violent acts in the future. Which is to say, he would be a threat if allowed to live in prison, or if he were ever given the chance of parole. Sen. John Cornyn (R), then Texas’ attorney general, included Buck’s in a list of cases that had been improperly decided—but Buck’s case was the only one that didn’t result in a re-trial. The Supreme Court granted a temporary injunction in October to give themselves time to decide whether to review the case.

Buck’s lead attorney, Kate Black of the Texas Defender Service, said her team is still considering its options going forward. Those include petitioning the Supreme Court for a re-hearing or requesting the state court to intervene. The Harris County district attorney now has the authority to request a new death warrant from the trial court. Texas law requires that the execution date be at least 31 days after the warrant is obtained, and with the upcoming holidays, that could further delay things. Once an execution date is set, Buck’s lawyers would have the chance to file a petition for clemency with the Texas Board of Prisons and Paroles, which will have an opportunity to recommend a new trial if it wishes (it’s already rejected that plea once).

Gov. Rick Perry plays a background role in all of this. “Our hope is the district attorney also has an interest in waiting at least to see what happens,” Black said. “If the district attorney does decide to set a new date it’ll go through the clemency process again and Governor Perry is obviously a part of that process.” Perry has the power to grant a one-time only 30-day stay of execution but has no power beyond that. He does, however, exert a good deal of influence on the Board of Pardons and Paroles, whose members are appointed by his office.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend