Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Dump Their Foreclosure Barons—for Good

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/respres/2539334956/">respres</a>/Flickr

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


It’s been a while since Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the twin housing corporations wrongly blamed for triggering the subprime mortgage meltdown and now essentially owned by American taxpayers, made headlines. But don’t be fooled: Change is underway at Fannie and Freddie in the wake of the financial crisis.

Most notably, Fannie and Freddie’s regulator announced (PDF) on Tuesday that the twins would soon shut down their network of high-powered foreclosure law firms around the country. These firms, paid to process foreclosures as fast and cheaply as possible, ran into trouble in recent years when some of these outfits were found to have backdated key legal documents and falsified signatures on affidavits. One of the largest “foreclosure mills” working for Fannie and Freddie was the now-defunct Law Offices of David J. Stern based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, whose questionable practices Mother Jones exposed last August.

As it happens, that MoJo expose is cited multiple times (as are other key stories) in the inspector general’s report released in late September that likely spurred Fannie and Freddie to ditch their foreclosure firms. Written by the inspector general for the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees Fannie and Freddie, the report’s authors found that Fannie knew of foreclosure abuse allegations against its attorneys as early as 2003—complaints that only mounted over the next seven years. But Fannie and the FHFA repeatedly failed to deal with the alleged abuses cropping up until criticism of the foreclosure mills reached a fever pitch in the fall of 2010. And even then, when the FHFA investigated the allegations and later sent a list of identified problems to Fannie, the regulator never followed up to see if any changes occurred, the IG report says.

The loss of Fannie and Freddie’s business will hit foreclosure firms hard. In the case of David J. Stern’s firm, the twins were a cash cow, especially when the number of foreclosures spiked after the housing bubble burst. In depositions, former employees said Stern referred to Fannie and Freddie as “his babies.” But Stern’s falling out with Fannie and Freddie arrived well before this latest news. Last fall, both companies stopped doing business with him in light of fraud allegations, news stories revealing a slew of improprieties at the firm, and an investigation by the Florida attorney general’s office. At the time, a Freddie spokesman said the cases handled by Stern would be moved to other firms “so they can be completed in compliance with state law.”

That said, for the foreclosure firms still in business, they might not be completely out of luck. The FHFA’s latest announcement said that instead of Fannie and Freddie using a stable of foreclosure attorneys, mortgage servicers would pick their own firms. As Mother Jones has reported, servicers have their fair share of problems, too. Time will tell if the FHFA’s reforms make any difference in Foreclosureland.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest