Ethics Complaint Over Coal Lawyers’ Inbreeding Claim

<a href="">nrdc_media</a>/Flickr

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Last summer, four coal-industry attorneys from the DC firm Crowell & Moring made headlines when they suggested that a study linking mountaintop removal mining to birth defects in Appalachia failed to consider the (inconsequential) effects of inbreeding in the region. Then they went on to advertise their services to companies looking to “counter unfounded claims of injury or disease.” This week, former West Virginia lawyer Jason Huber filed an ethics complaint (PDF), alleging that the firm violated the DC Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct, which state that a “lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer’s services.”

The attorneys’ advertisement “perpetuates and exploits the empirically debunked notion that inbreeding is regularly practiced by the Appalachian People,” Huber wrote.

When Charleston Gazette blogger Ken Ward Jr. first pointed out the inbreeding statement that the law firm posted on its website in June, the firm quickly removed it and issued an apology. This week, a spokeswoman told Ward that Crowell & Moring “again express[es] our regret for any offense that might have been taken with the client alert, as it was meant only to relay a possible flaw with a scientific study.” But, she added, Huber’s “complaint is without merit.”

Ward has the full story here.



Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend