NATO Head: Libya Mission Kinda Accomplished (VIDEO)

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anders_Fogh_Rasmussen_-_World_Economic_Forum_Annual_Meeting_Davos_2008_-_2.jpg">World Economic Forum/Flickr</a>

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen declared a victory of sorts in Libya yesterday, saying that “we can already draw the first lessons from the operation, and most of them are positive.”

“We will continue military operations under our United Nations mandate for as long as necessary to protect the people of Libya,” he cautioned, “but no longer than necessary.” Nonetheless, Rasmussen left the door open for continued NATO bombing: “If requested, NATO stands ready to play a supporting role so that Libyans can move forward safely.”

Rasmussen, a dynamic Danish politician with a polished silvery coif, made the comments in a video (see below) on his blog. His posting on serious trans-Atlantic affairs has been somewhat sparse of late—this gingerly triumphal post, titled “Libya operation coming to an end,” is his first since July 15, when Western nations including the US formally recognized the Libyan rebels’ Transitional National Council as the country’s legitimate leadership.

As Denmark’s pro-markets, pro-globalization prime minister in the mid-2000s, Rasmussen forged a strong relationship with George W. Bush—the president apparently shared his enthusiasm for bicycle statesmanship, and Denmark contributed troops to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He appears to have drawn some lessons from the shortcomings of the former president’s infamous 2003 “Mission Accomplished” speech: Take ownership of victory on the battlefield, but quickly hand off responsibility for any continuing conflict. “The Libyan people are beginning to shape their future,” he said, adding, “We all agree that the United Nations should take the leading role in assisting the people of Libya in the aftermath of the conflict.”

So, what’s changing, then? Probably not much in the short term—particularly with Muammar Qaddafi and his last remaining loyalists still on the loose. But, as with Iraq in 2003, the Western security establishment appears poised to take a step back from a military intervention of its choosing, and to blame any future mess on the people it helped liberate.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest