The Abortion Debate, Coming to a Bumper Near You

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Anti-abortion lawmakers in North Carolina have passed a bill allowing the state to issue license plates with a pro-life slogan. Drivers can buy the “Choose Life” plate for a $25 fee, and $15 of that will go to so-called “crisis pregnancy centers” that seek to deter women from having an abortion. Now the state chapter of the ACLU has filed suit, arguing that the state is violating the First Amendment by not offering plates that include a message in support of abortion rights.

There were attempts to get an alternative plate during the legislative debate, with options like “Respect Choice” or “Trust Women. Respect Choice” offered. But lawmakers rejected those, and while House Bill 289 included a bunch of new license plate options, there wasn’t a pro-choice option among them. Residents of the Tar Heel state can, however, show their support for the NC Horse Council, the Carolina Raptor Center, fox hunting, stock car racing, the Friends of the Appalachian Trail, or AIDS awareness, in addition to the anti-abortion plate.

“If anti-choice drivers are permitted to express their views on their license plates, people like me should be able to express our view that women deserve full reproductive freedom,” Sue Holliday, one of the four plaintiffs in the ACLU’s complaint, said in a statement.

And here’s what Katherine Lewis Parker, the legal director of the ACLU of North Carolina, had to say:

This is a basic issue of freedom of speech and fairness. It is a fundamental tenet of the First Amendment that the State cannot use its authority to promote one side of a debate while denying the same opportunity to the other side. Anyone who supports freedom of speech should agree with this stance, regardless of one’s position on abortion. Our position would be the same if the State had authorized a pro-choice license plate but not an anti-choice alternative. In that situation, the ACLU-NCLF would be suing on behalf of anti-choice drivers under the exact same theory of viewpoint discrimination.

Of course, the supporters of the plate aren’t big fans of the suit. Rep. Mitch Gillespie, the bill’s sponsor, told the Raleigh News & Observer that the suit is just an attempt by “an evil liberal organization to try to appease its liberal base.”

Twenty-six states have their own versions of the “Choose Life” plate. Its supporters say that 573,000 plates have been sold or renewed, which has raised $13.6 million for their cause.

Maybe it’s just me, but it seems nuts that the state would be involved in promoting any specific interest group via license plates—pro-life, pro-choice, pro-NASCAR, whatever. Creating and selling them uses state resources… and what’s the benefit to the state? We’d never ask for special endorsement stickers for your driver’s license or passport. Can’t people just get a regular-old-license-plate and donate directly to whatever interest group or issue they feel inclined to support? And, if you really must share that passion via your automobile, can’t you just buy whatever bumper sticker you want? 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend