Pakistan Allowed China to Survey Top-Secret US Helicopter? No Surprise There

A UH-60 Black Hawk Helicopter.<a href="">SSGT Suzanne M. Jenkins</a>/Wikimedia Commons

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Since the killing of Osama bin Laden, stories have trickled out about various aspects of the May 1 raid, with details ranging from enlightening to confusingly macabre. Headline-ready tidbits—the CIA’s DNA collection operation in Abbottabad, a rejected Al Qaeda plot involving sword-twirling death tractors, or Osama’s porno collection, for example—all appeared to slightly redeem American intelligence services, paint Al Qaeda as incurably vulnerable, and/or humiliate Pakistan and the ISI.

But Sunday’s news story regarding the aftermath of the bin Laden mission kind of reads like the Chinese got the last chuckle. US officials are claiming that, with the blessing of Pakistani officials, Chinese military engineers were permitted to take photos of and extract samples from the abandoned US Black Hawk stealth helicopter that crashed into the Abbottabad compound, according to the Financial Times:

“The US now has information that Pakistan, particularly the ISI, gave access to the Chinese military to the downed helicopter…” said one person in intelligence circles…The Chinese engineers were allowed to survey the wreckage and take photographs of it, as well as take samples of the special “stealth” skin that allowed the American team to enter Pakistan undetected by radar, he said…

“The Chinese would have enormous interest in this newfangled technology,” said [a senior US government official]. “They [Seals] did not blow the thing up for no reason,” he said.

(Predictably, Pakistani military and government officials have emphatically denied the story, with Foreign Office spokeswoman Tehmina Janjua calling the Financial Times report “baseless and speculative.”)

The most depressing thing about this revelation wasn’t China’s speedy opportunism, the potential compromise of classified information, or even Pakistan’s knee-jerk betrayal. It was precisely that nothing about any of this was surprising at all. Allies or not, legal or not, everybody involved acted accordingly. Josh Vorhees of Slate bluntly and correctly described the news item as one that “[w]e all pretty much saw…coming.” Hell, Fareed Zakaria called this one back in mid-May during an interview on CNN (emphasis my own):

What would happen if we were to cut [off US aid to Pakistan]? They would harbor al Qaeda terrorists in their territory? They already do that. They would cooperate with other countries? They’re already telling the Chinese that they can take a look at the helicopter that went down. So everything that we feared that they could do, they’re already doing.

Along with the customary tension between US and Pakistani intelligence agencies, the chief reasons for the alleged cooperation with Chinese officials are glaringly simple: money and arms. China’s increasing willingness to provide both means the Pakistanis see it as a dependable ally—one they will need in the future, especially since powerful elements within the Pakistani elite operate in the framework of a future war with India. Reuters reports (emphasis my own):

Despite the billions in [American] aid, Pakistan still considers China a more reliable ally than the United States. China is a major investor in predominantly Muslim Pakistan in areas such as telecommunications, ports and infrastructure. The countries are linked by a Chinese-built road pushed through Pakistan’s northern mountains.

Trade with Pakistan is worth almost $9 billion a year for Pakistan, and China is its top arms supplier.

In the wake of attacks that left 11 people dead in the China’s western region of Xinjiang in late July, Pakistan dispatched the ISI’s Pasha to Beijing.

All of this news only helps to underscore the abysmal relationship between the United States and Pakistan, as well as Pakistan’s own cynical approach to strategic and national interests. Pakistan working against American security goals in the region is, and has been for quite some time, a sad cliché.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend