States Leave No Child Left Behind Behind

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Tired of waiting for Congress to fix No Child Left Behind, Oregon passed its own package of laws similar to NCLB last month that include their own, customized approaches to accountability systems. Why? According to current NCLB measurements, four out of five schools nationwide could be labeled as failures, and could possibly lose all federal funding. So, state lawmakers in several states including Indiana and Tennessee are improving these scales by developing their own systems that will take into account things besides test scores such as students’ individual progress, graduation rates, and enrollment in AP courses. It doesn’t mean these states are opting out of NCLB, but state funding to public schools is significant–it accounted for half in California last year–and can be attached to its own accountability measures. 

Most teachers at San Francisco’s Mission High want to see a similar approach, although they’d like to see more weight attached to other measures such as grades; attendance, suspension, and dropout rates; student, parent and teacher satisfaction surveys; and how many Latino and African-American students enroll in Honors and APs.

Tennessee school superintendant Tony Bennett tells the New York Times that he wants to see even schools where the majority of students are performing well to focus on raising the achievement among the bottom 25 percent of students. Right now, there are no incentives to do that. Lillian Lowery, Delaware’s secretary of education, also says she wants to see more local control over the use of federal funding.

Incidentally, Oregon came up with its own solution to the “debt crisis” too. Rather than completely gut school funding and other essential government services like most states, Oregonians voted to raise taxes on the highest-income residents and corporations earlier this year. 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend