Income Inequality and Happiness

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

A new study finds that lower-income Americans are happier when the gap between the rich and poor is smaller… for those at the top, there’s no difference. The study, to be published in Psychological Science, might help explain why, despite the US’s growing overall wealth, many people aren’t happier. After all, it’s hard to keep your chin up when the top 10% of the country pulls in $164,647 a year while the bottom 90% only earns around $31,244. That disparity—seeing just how much more others have—was responsible for people in the lower and middle classes feeling more distrustful during times of greater income inequality. It wasn’t so much their own earnings as seeing them in comparison to others’ that made them feel things weren’t fair. The distrust and feeling of unfairness were what resulted in feelings of unhappiness, not earning less. Correspondingly, the happiness of those in the upper classes was not affected by income inequality. 

The study followed 48,000 people over 37 years. And the current state of income inequality did not go unnoticed by the researchers. Their suggestion for making things more equitable? Better taxation. Let’s see how that goes over in 2012. 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend