Liberals and David Koch Agree: Trump’s Presidential Bid Is a Stunt

A sign at a pro-labor rally outside the Wisconsin Capitol in February.John Murray/johnmurrayphoto.com

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Believe it or not, David Koch, the billionaire donor to right-wing think tanks and political advocacy groups, and liberals have something in common: They both see Donald Trump’s presidential bid as a PR stunt by a man who’s not suited to run the country.

Koch, dubbed by some as the “tea party’s wallet,” had some less-than-flattering words for Trump in an interview with New York Daily News earlier this week. Koch described Trump’s political positions over the past decade as “highly variable and unusual,” adding, “He’s a wonderful guy, but I don’t think he should run for office.” Koch went on to say, “At some point, I think he’s going to drop out of the race when he realizes that he’s really not qualified to be president.” Ouch.

Koch also dealt a blow to 2012 frontrunner Mitt Romney, who counted Koch as a supporter in the 2008 race. At this point in the 2012 race, Koch told the Daily News he hasn’t settled on a candidate yet, despite the fact that Koch hosted a major shindig for Romney last summer in the Hamptons and multiple Romney staffers insisting that Koch remains a Mitt supporter.

The potential loss of Koch as a backer comes amidst the news that a key Romney campaign chairman from 2008 cut ties with Romney. As I reported on Wednesday, Bruce Keough, the chair of Rommey’s New Hampshire campaign in 2008, declined to sign on for 2012, citing the candidate’s ever-changing political identity. Romney, Keough says, “manages to say things that cause people to think, ‘Wait a second: I thought I knew him, and now I’m not so sure.'” As for the impact of Keough’s departure, one veteran New Hampshire political analyst said, “If somebody like Keough said that to the campaign, it’s going to be very interesting to see how that plays out up here.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest