Deciphering the Defense Budget, and More

<a href="">Center for Defense Information</a>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Flying in the face of skeptical Democrats and Republicans, Robert Gates’ Defense Department today is expected to unveil the largest military budget proposal in United States history: $553 billion $670.6 billion for what Gates calls “the minimum level of defense spending that is necessary, given the complex and unpredictable array of security challenges.” That comes on the heels of a major overhaul, announced last Tuesday, in the military’s bedrock guidance, the “National Military Strategy.” Its gist: We face new challenges in the Middle East and Asia. (More money, please.)

Funny thing is, plenty of stuff will be missing from the Pentagon’s “bottom line”…and plenty more questions will go unanswered. That’s pretty much the norm: Pro-military politicians, defense contractors, and military brass alike tend to defend their federal dollars with patriotic rhetoric and confusing bureaucratese. The hope, it often seems, is to push journalists and laypeople into complacency on national-security spending. But Winslow Wheeler, director of the Straus Military Reform Project at the Center for Defense Information, has a democratizing antidote to this military-industrial fever: a new e-book titled The Pentagon Labyrinth: 10 Short Essays to Help You Through It. “How did the American political system maneuver itself into such a destructive straightjacket?” he writes in the preface. “This handbook is intended to provide readers—particularly students of defense, young military professionals, new Capitol Hill staff and concerned citizens—with the tools to understand the Pentagon’s contribution to this mess and what might be needed to clean it up.”

The Pentagon Labyrinth is a pretty sharp 154-page primer on the most critical areas of military culture everyone should know, from budget-setting to strategizing to careerism in the ranks. And it tackles some recent military gospel truths that most mainstream journalists have failed to highlight. For example, it is a truth universally acknowledged by Air Force generals that the service’s newest operational fighter jet, the F-22, is the greatest plane in the world. According to Wheeler, chapter nine of the handbook (“Evaluating Weapons: Sorting the Good from the Bad”) “can start the reader on an adventure that leads to a very different conclusion.”

Whether you’re a wonk-in-training or a casual WikiLeaks cable surfer, this is a very cool resource. The book, individual chapters, and supplemental sources are available for free on the websites of the CDI and the Project on Government Oversight. Readers are also encouraged to share the wealth: If you have questions about a chapter, email its author at the email address provided therein. And if you want to spread the text around, feel free. “We encourage you to circulate the handbook liberally, or even to create your own Web page for it,” Wheeler tells readers. But first things first: Read the doggone manual, citizens!


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend