David Stockman and the New Conservative “Religion”

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Photo Courtesy of the Ronald Reagan Presidential LibraryPhoto Courtesy of the Ronald Reagan Presidential LibraryWhen conservative politicians want to take a rain check on criticizing a member of their own party, they like to invoke Reagan’s 11th Commandment: “Thall shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican.”

This is, of course, frequently ignored. But it’s not the only commandment that’s subject to selective enforcement—that whole bit about “false idols,” for instance. For the better part of three decades, conservative policy-makers have revered a president who never really existed: a tax-cutting, deficit-fighting, savior who starved the beast of big government. Today’s budget hawks alternatively cite Reagan as evidence that deficits don’t matter, and then again as evidence that they do.

But don’t take it from me; take it from the architect of the Reagan tax cuts himself: former budget director David Stockman (top, left). “[T]he simplistic and reckless idea that the way to stimulate the economy is to cut taxes anytime, anywhere, for any reason, became embedded [in the GOP],” Stockman told MoJo‘s David Corn. “It has become a religion, it has become a catechism. It’s become a mindless incantation.”

So where did Republicans go wrong—and how can they make things right? Stockman’s prescription for fixing the economy might come as a bit of a shock, not the least of all to Congressional Republicans. Check out David’s interview with Stockman from our March/April issue.

And while you’re at it, here’s a bonus long-read for your lunch break: Bill Greider’s 1981 portrait of the budget director as a young man, in The Atlantic. I was going to describe it as a “fascinating look at the work of a budget director,” and realized that makes it sound incredibly boring, which it’s not; really, what’s remarkable is Stockman’s candor even then. As he told Greider, “None of us really understands what’s going on with all these numbers.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest