The Nail in Michael Steele’s Political Coffin

Flickr/<a href="">roberthuffstutter</a>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Michael Steele, the gaffe-prone, soon-to-be-ousted chairman of the Republican National Committee, has left the committee’s reputation in tatters. But what may truly seal Steele’s downfall is his abysmal stewardship of the RNC’s finances.

The committee is buried under $20 million of debt, and the RNC’s financial health is in the worst shape it has been in three decades, the Washington Post reported on Friday. Hundreds of donors are fleeing the turmoil-ridden RNC, and the $7 million raised by the committee for the midterm elections was a small fraction of what it raked in during the 2006 midterms. (The Democratic National Committee raised $38 million for the 2010 elections.) Surely part of the RNC’s woeful fundraising is due to the rise of powerful outside groups like Crossroads GPS and American Action Network, which have big-name organizers and scant disclosure requirements. But Michael Steele’s error-filled tenure at the RNC’s helm no doubt contributed to the flight of donors.

Here’s what one donor told the Post:

“You can’t even dream of winning in 2012 with that kind of operation,” said John Dowd, a Washington lawyer and longtime RNC donor who decided against contributing in the past two years because of the “mess” at the party. “As long as it’s in that kind of shape, I can’t even think of giving.”

With Steele’s ouster all but assured, it’ll be up to his replacement—the odds favor Reince Priebus, the head of the Wisconsin GOP—to revive the RNC’s fundraising machine. In a letter announcing his entrance into the RNC race in December, Priebus wrote, “We will work to regain the confidence of our donor base and I will personally call our major donors to ask them to rejoin our efforts at the RNC.” That’ll be the next chairman’s true test: Can he or she lure back donors from the independent outside groups that so heavily influenced the 2010 midterms, or is the RNC’s long-term influence diminished for good? 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend