GOP’s Latest Consumer Bureau Attack

Test Ticker

Monika Bauerlein,
CEO

Dear Reader,

December is make-or-break for Mother Jones’ fundraising. We have a $350,000 goal that we simply cannot afford to miss. And in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we explain, as matter-of-fact as we can, how being a nonprofit means everything to us. Bottom line: Donations big and small make up 74 percent of our budget this year and are urgently needed this month, and all online gifts will be matched and go twice as far until we hit our goal. Please pitch in if you can right now.

December is make-or-break for Mother Jones’ fundraising, and in "No Cute Headlines or Manipulative BS," we hope that giving it to you as matter-of-fact as we can will work to raise the $350,000 we need to raise this month. Donations make up 74 percent of our budget this year, and all online gifts will be matched and go twice as far until we hit our goal.

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/republicanconference/4296477670/sizes/m/in/photostream/">republicanconference</a>

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

You knew this was coming. Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Tex.), the new oversight chief on the House financial services committee, sent a letter on Tuesday to Elizabeth Warren, who runs the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, grilling her on the bureau’s plans while slamming the bureau altogether. According to Politico, Neugebauer writes that Warren is “tasked with executing a fatally flawed plan” by getting the consumer bureau up and running.

Neugebauer’s questioning ranges from the nuts and bolts of running the bureau to requests for detailed information on Warren’s meetings with top financial regulatory agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Reserve, among others. But other questions clearly show Neugebauer’s opposition to the agency and belief that it’s just more unneeded regulation. For instance, he asks: “What policies are in place to avoid potential duplicative, conflicting or overlapping rule-making that are currently underway, but will ultimately be under the regulatory authority of the CFPB?” He also demands Warren explain how the bureau’s new rule-making would “avoid the kind of overregulation that might stifle innovation.”

Not that Neugebauer’s dislike of the bureau is surprising. Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.), the financial services committee chair, has expressed his distaste for Warren’s outfit. So has Rep. Ed Royce (R-Calif.), a top member on the committee, who’s tried to hack away at the bureau’s rule-making power by giving bank regulators—the ones who failed to prevent the meltdown of 2008—veto power over the bureau. Already Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the ranking member of the banking committee and consumer bureau opponent, has demanded that Warren make her schedule public.

Neugebauer’s letter is only the beginning. The GOP-led financial services committee will no doubt make the declawing of the consumer bureau a priority in the 112th Congress, and it’ll be up to Democrats to stand their ground and defend the much-needed bureau for which they fought so hard.