And the Winner of the Final Brown/Whitman Debate Is. . .

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Tom Brokaw. Man, why can’t this guy run for governor? Taking a break for his documentary gig to moderate the final Brown/Whitman debate, Brokaw outdid both candidates in cutting to the heart of the state’s problems. He asked what Californians can do for California, if anything, and what they thought of polls showing that the state’s voters were “utterly unrealistic” about what can be cut from government spending without affecting services. He asked whether Proposition 13 was a “sacred cow” or a “boulder in the road” to reform. And he wrapped up by wondering if the candidates supported any structural reforms such as major changes to California’s dysfunctional constitution. He didn’t get many straight answers. But he did straighten out Republican Meg Whitman at one point by fact-checking her claim that Brown had caused job losses while governing California in the ’70s. (The national recession was to blame, Brokaw noted; Western states run by Republicans at the time had also lost jobs). It’s nice to find somebody with enough perspective to see that the real story behind this race is the death of the California Dream. Too bad the state’s electoral politics aren’t really set up to discuss how to revive it.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend