Palin Decries Koran Burning and Mosques in Same Post

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Sarah Palin’s done it again with another contradictory statement so confusing it will make your brain hurt. In a Facebook post today, Palin decried Pastor Terry Jones’s plans to burn Korans. Sure, okay. Great. THEN she wrote that being sensitive toward other religions was the reason the Park51 prayer space shouldn’t be built. “People have a constitutional right to burn a Koran if they want to, but doing so is insensitive and an unnecessary provocation–much like building a mosque at Ground Zero,” Palin wrote. “Freedom of religion is integral to our charters of liberty… In this as in all things, we should remember the Golden Rule. Isn’t that what the Ground Zero mosque debate has been about?”

Not really, no. First of all, the Ground Zero mosque isn’t AT ground zero: it’s two blocks away, past the subway station, the Century 21 discount store, and dozens of other businesses that are much closer to the former WTC site than it is. Secondly, burning a Qur’an in Florida is NOT the same thing as building a prayer space in lower Manhattan unless you’re willing to assert that all Christians (Sarah Palin included) have the same beliefs as Terry Jones and all Muslims have the same beliefs as the 9/11 hijackers. In opposing the mosque, Palin is writing as if the 9/11 attackers represented the views of all Muslims, which is like saying the acts of the Ku Klux Klan represent the views of all white people.

In case Palin forgets, Christians do not have an exclusive right to the former WTC site AND the three-block radius around it. The twin towers themselves were almost certainly built on the graves of slaves, some of them Muslim. Ground Zero is equally hallowed for the Muslim, Buddhist, or Jewish office workers who died there on 9/11, and all should be allowed to pray nearby. To think that only Muslims should be forced elsewhere could be called “insensitive.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend