Beck Admits to Lie About Archives Visit

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Fox News star Glenn Beck has admitted what we reported on Wednesday: that he lied when he stood at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial Saturday during his “Restoring Honor” rally and said he had held George Washington’s first inaugural address in his hands during a VIP visit to the National Archives. During his show yesterday, Beck laughed off playing loose with the facts, saying that he thought describing the actual details of his visit to the Archives would be “too much useless information” and of course, mess up the flow of his speech. But he did concede, “They got me.”

And then Beck did it again. He blamed Sandy Berger for his inability to fondle the rare inaugural address. Berger was the former Clinton administration national security adviser who pleaded guilty to taking classified documents out of the Archives and destroying them in 2003. Beck’s charge that Berger’s actions are the reason he couldn’t touch a rare and priceless 220-year-old historic document is a stretch. After all, the documents Berger swiped (related to the Clinton White House’s terrorism policy) were not rare, nor were they likely to disintegrate upon touch. Researchers at the Archive (reporters, authors, historians, hobbyists)  routinely handle actual documents in the vast collection—but not rare items, such as Washington’s address. And, of course, the Archives did not wait until 2003 and the Berger affair to implement stringent, no-touch rules for its most precious documents. 

Still, Beck came clean (for a change) on the main charge. 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest