TOP GUN’s Gay-Hating Legacy?

US Navy photo/<a href=",Jolly_Rogers%5Erdquo,_of_Strike_Fighter_Squadron_One_Zero_Three_(VFA-103)_aboard_the_Nimitz-class_a.jpg">Wikimedia Commons</a>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Consider for a moment TOP GUN, that shirtless-volleyball-and-locker-room-celebratin‘ Tom Cruise vehicle of the ’80s. Even before Kenny Loggins and Berlin laid down the glitzy soundtrack, TOP GUN was possibly the gayest military movie ever made. And yet it’s beloved by naval aviators the world ’round.

Part of its legacy is the celebration of the aviator’s call sign, the nickname bestowed on him (or, since May 1991, her) by squadron mates. Sure, call signs were around before TOP GUN, but by the ’90s, thanks to the naval aviation community’s filmic opus, they’d really become a point of pride, both initiation rite and operational moniker. (In the movie, this is taken to a point of absurdity, where even Anthony Edwards’ wife calls him “Goose” instead of his Christian name. Creepy.)

But combine it with the testosterone-charged atmosphere in a fighter squadron, and the call-sign tradition can have a truly ugly side—one that Ensign Steve Crowston discovered firsthand when he joined the pilot fraternity last year. According to Navy Times:

…when the new admin officer walked into the ready room for Strike Fighter Squadron 136 in Virginia last year, he claims he found dozens of aviators—including the squadron’s commanding officer—openly mocking him as an alleged homosexual.

“Fagmeister” was one of the proposed call signs scrawled in the white erase board, he said.

“Gay boy” was another.

The squadron ultimately chose “Romo’s Bitch”—an apparent reference to his love for the Dallas Cowboys and their quarterback, Tony Romo.

“I was like, wait a minute? What the hell? You think I’m gay? What a way to tell me that,” said Crowston…

….Crowston said his command was dismissive about his complaints. He said other officers believed it was “a joke and meant to funny.”

Crowston, who’d served a fair amount of time before making it into the naval air community, declined to tell the paper his sexual orientation, but he did call the call signs “workplace harassment” and filed a formal complaint with Navy lawyers.

Beyond the obvious homophobia and DADT overtones here, there’s a deeper problem that goes all the way back to Tailhook: The men and women we entrust to fly these $60 million weapons platforms off aircraft carriers and into harm’s way, they share the collective sense of humor and propriety of a Jerky Boy:

Crowston’s complaint underscores concerns in the aviation community that call signs—a deeply entrenched but unofficial custom—are often inappropriate, bawdy or outright offensive.

The Naval Safety Center’s websites lists the “best all time call signs,” including Lt. Chuck “Dingle” Berry and Lt. Tom “Butts” Tench. The Navy recently posted a photo of Lt. Cmdr. Timothy Myers with his call sign “Taint” painted on his F/A-18E Super Hornet on the carrier George H.W. Bush.

You smell that, civilian? That’s the taint of freedom! No wonder we’re No. 1!


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend