Is the Spill Victims’ Fund Keeping BP and the Feds in Bed?

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In mid-June, when oil was still gushing from the Gulf well with no end in sight and pressure was mounting on the administration to show some spine, Obama called BP’s top executives to the White House for a summit. The parties emerged with an agreement that BP would set aside $20 billion in a fund administered by an independent mediator to compensate business owners and residents who suffered economic damages because of the spill. The president said the fund would “provide substantial assurance that the claims people and businesses have will be honored” and would ensure that BP followed through on its promise to make Gulf residents whole. “The people of the Gulf have my commitment that BP will meet its obligations to them,” said Obama. 

But the specifics of that agreement for the $20 billion fund were finally released last week (full agreement is here), and critics are now saying say the plan jeopardizes the government’s ability to hold BP accountable. In a letter to President Obama last week, the watchdog group Public Citizen outlined “very serious concerns” with the structure of the deal. The company agreed to deposit $5 billion into the escrow fund this year and $1.25 billion every quarter from 2011 through 2013, for a total of $20 billion. But securing the money is contingent upon BP’s Gulf subsidiary remaining profitable—which, of course, might not happen if the federal government follows through with the kind of criminal and civil penalties and that many Americans believe the company should receive for it’s negligence in the disaster. Another problem: The plan actually creates a perverse incentive for the company to increase drilling offshore in the United States, since under the terms of the deal, the money in the fund will come from revenue from BP’s Gulf of Mexico drilling operations.

If the government gets serious about cracking down on BP, the oil giant could face up to $21 billion in fines for Clean Water Act violations alone. At some point, the federal government is also going to send the company a bill for the damages to natural resources. There are also likely to be major fines for worker health and safety violations, considering how many people died or were injured in the blast. And don’t forget the ongoing criminal probe into the disaster, which could determine further liability for the company. But Public Citizen warns that under the terms of this agreement, it’s likely that the government “would be reluctant to mete out harsh sanctions to BP”—sanctions like banning the company from obtaining new leases in the Gulf, a measure included in the House spill bill.

“The proposed arrangement is wildly inappropriate, as it will make the government and BP virtual partners in Gulf oil production,” says Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen’s energy program. “It will give the government a financial incentive to become an even bigger booster of offshore oil drilling in the Gulf.”

It gets worse. The escrow fund agreement is with BP Exploration & Production Inc., a subsidiary of BP America Production that deals primarily with Gulf of Mexico production. BP America Production is a subsidiary of BP Company North America, which is a subsidiary of BP Corporation North America, which is a subsidiary of BP America Inc., which is a subsidiary of the parent company BP. In case you’re counting, that means the escrow deal is with a subsidiary five layers removed from BP PLC, the multinational oil giant. Because the deal is with a subsidiary way down the chain, it would be difficult to access additional funds from the corporate parent should the subsidiary collapse or simply not have enough funds to meet the obligation, since it’s the subsidiary, not the parent corporation, that’s legally on the hook, says Public Citizen. At the very least, says Slocum, the deal should have been negotiated with BP America Inc. to ensure access to more of the company’s resources. Slocum adds that the deal should also include provisions to ensure that BP puts more cash into the fund should $20 billion turn out to be inadequate.

Public Citizen is lobbying for the feds to renegotiate a deal that ensures that victim compensation does not come at the cost of letting BP off with a slap on the wrist rather than meaningful sanctions. Considering the fact that 11 workers died and 17 were injured in the explosion on April 20, and the resulting spill unleashed a record 4.9 million barrels of oil into the US waters and caused untold environmental and economic damage, Public Citizen believes the deal should be much harder on BP. “If you can’t negotiate a good deal with those facts in front of you, then you need to get new negotiators,” said Slocum. “I don’t know what the administration is thinking on this.”

Special Report: Check out our in-depth investigation of BP’s crimes in the Gulf, “BP’s Deep Secrets.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend