Obamacare 1, Robert Samuelson 0

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/moon_child/3965679774/">moon child</a> (<a href="http://www.creativecommons.org" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>).

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Jon Cohn has already pretty thoroughly demolished Robert Samuelson’s Washington Post “Obamacare” op-ed from this morning. But I wanted to highlight one especially amusing/depressing failure on Samuelson’s part. In the column, which focuses on how problems for Massachusetts’ health care system could become problems for Obamacare, Samuelson mentions a state commission’s recommendation that Massachusetts move away from “fee-for-service—which ties reimbursement to individual services” because it “rewards quantity over quality and discourages coordinated care among doctors and hospitals.” The commission, Samuelson explains: 

…recommended a ‘global payments’ system to force hospitals, doctors and clinics to create networks (‘accountable care organizations’). These would receive flat per-patient payments to promote effective—not just expensive—care. Payments would be ‘risk adjusted’; sicker patients would justify higher payments.

But the commission offered no blueprint, and efforts to craft consensus among providers, consumer groups and insurers have failed. State Senate President Therese Murray, an advocate of payment change, has given up for this year. “Nobody is in agreement on anything,” she told the Boston Globe.

What Samuelson misses, however, is that the Affordable Care Act (dreaded “Obamacare”) includes a provision implementing the recommendations of the commission. It’s Section 2705 of the law, and it was inserted by Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry (see here, “modified Kerry #C3”). In other words, the Massachusetts senator successfully inserted the Massachusetts’ commission’s recommendation into the health reform law so Massachusetts could move forward on it. Sure, the Kerry provision only applies to Medicaid and is limited to five states. But the main point holds: The specific thing that Samuelson says isn’t happening, but should, is actually happening right now.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest