Enviro News Roundup: Should Gulf Coast Strip Clubs Get a Cut of the $20 Billion?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Today in BP oil disaster news:

BP is now reinstalling the containment cap after a robotic vehicle hit it yesterday and forced crews to remove the cap.

Speaking of BP, if you’ve seen their work in the Gulf, wait until you hear what the company has planned for the Arctic.

The country’s third largest pension fund, the $132.6 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund, is suing BP for losses incurred following the Gulf disaster. “BP misled investors about its safety procedures and its ability to respond to events like the ongoing oil spill, and we’re going to hold it accountable,” said New York State comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli.

Among the many tough decisions ahead for oil spill fund czar Kenneth Feinberg? Whether a strip club that caters to oil-rig workers should get a piece of the $20 billion fund oil spill victims.

The House passed a bill to grant the power of subpoena to the presidential oil spill commission on Wednesday evening.

Emergency workers in Pensacola Beach, Fla. found an oil-covered dolphin stranded on the beach yesterday.

In climate news:

Yesterday’s White House meeting on climate and energy policy was delayed due to the unscheduled spanking of Gen. Stanley McChrystal. No update yet on a new date and time for the meeting.

Environmental groups are circulating a memo of the highlights of Sen. Lindsey Graham’s flip-flopping on climate change, as Climatewire reports. It seems like just yesterday the South Carolina Republican was our best hope for bipartisanship on an energy package, doesn’t it?

A measure to suspend California’s landmark climate law will be on the ballot in November. Now, state environmental groups are fighting to protect AB32.

Ninety seven percent of climate researchers agree with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: the planet is warming, and humans are causing it. The new study was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The IPCC also released the names of the 813 scientists who have been selected to contribute to its fifth assessment report on climate change, which is due out in 2014.

Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) worries that if Congress takes action to curb global warming pollution, old people in the south are going to die. Yes, that’s if we take action, because he worries about whether they can afford air conditioning, not about warming up the planet. He knows this because he’s a doctor, of course. “They’re gonna get dehydration and people are gonna have a lot of problems and it’s gonna have a greater impact on our health care system and people are gonna die because of that,” says Broun. “And it’s gonna kill jobs too.”

And in other environmental news:

Democrats in the House are trying to broker a deal with natural gas companies to get them to disclose the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, a process to extract natural gas from the ground. Some companies are using toxic substances, but they are currently exempted from disclosing them under the Clean Water Act.

The New York Times Magazine contemplates the end of tuna.

After three years of discussion about how to reduce whaling, the meeting of the International Whaling Commission in Agadir, Morocco, fell apart yesterday. “Fundamental positions remained very much apart,” according to the IWC chairman Anthony Liverpool.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend