Watch Al-Jazeera’s Video From the Gaza Ship Raid

<a href="">Andrew Exum/Abu Muqawama</a>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Adding to the already-considerable fount of video and oral evidence from Monday’s Israeli flotilla raid, Al Jazeera English today interviewed its own reporter, who had been shooting footage on the weatherdeck of the cargo ship Mavi Marmara and was subsequently detained until this morning. That producer, Jamal ElShayyal, told a story that—if true—depicts criminal (or, at least, criminally stupid) behavior by the Israeli boarding party:

Of course, the source always has to be considered. But AJE manages to get where many media outlets can’t or won’t, and the video, which intersperses ElShayyal’s own standup reports from the ship deck, offers some support for the shipboard protesters’ allegations against the Israel Defense Forces.

ElShayyal claims that Israeli forces first deployed flash-bang grenades and tear gas. Then, about five minutes later, the live fire began.

“There was definitely fire from the air because one of the individuals who was killed was clearly shot from above,” he says. “There was also fire coming from the sea as well.”

He didn’t seem to think that live fire was ordered, as the IDF claimed, after two of its own soldiers were overpowered and their sidearms taken. “There’s no doubt from what I saw that live ammunition was fired before any Israeli soldier was on deck,” ElShayyal says:

After I had done my first file, I turned around to see what was going on, and there were several shots fired. In fact, one of the helicopters at the front of the ship, you could almost see the soldiers pointing their guns down through some sort of hole or compartment at the bottom side of the helicopter and firing almost indiscriminately without even looking where they were firing. And those bullets were definitely live bullets.

ElShayyal adds that after he watched two people on the deck shot and killed, he witnessed a confrontation between the Israeli boarding party and protesters below decks, where three wounded individuals were being sheltered:

There was a Knesset member who approached the Israeli soldiers saying, ‘We have injured”-she was saying, “They have injured people, please come and take them,” yet the Israelis refused. Three hours later, all three of those people that were injured ended up dying on the spot because no one came to take them.”

To be fair, ElShayyal stresses that he saw brutality on all sides: “I definitely saw iron bars,” he says. “The passengers took apart some of the railing bars on the ships…I did see a number of the Israeli soldiers being beaten by them.”

But no matter. All of this potentially adds up to some big Israeli violations of international conventions of war—and probably IDF military regulations, too. At the very least, it’s safe to say that the Israeli combat elements need remediation in counterinsurgent and naval boarding tactics—something that experts like The New Yorker‘s George Packer and Afghanistan veteran Andrew Exum at Abu Muqawama have already said in eloquent terms. As Packer says:

At one time, Israelis understood counterinsurgency much better than Americans, which is why U.S. officers looked to their Israeli counterparts for advice in the early years of the Iraq war. At one time, the Israelis understood that self-interest demanded subtlety, restraint, and attention to perception. As others have pointed out, these qualities have been disappearing from Israeli strategy and tactics, and the current right-wing government seems determined to isolate and destroy itself with the unbending principle of self-defense.

Exum puts his critique in far more trenchant—and visual—terms, in a post titled “Fast-Roping 101“:

For the record, the IDF’s apparent stupidity extended beyond the initial engagement to the detention of the protesters and journalists. AJE’s anchor asked ElShayyal how he was treated the past three days.

“To be honest, I think maybe ‘with contempt’ is probably the most polite” way of putting it, he said.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend