Climate Bill Cheat Sheet

Photo by Kate Sheppard.

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


After six months of grueling negotiations, John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) on Wednesday unveiled a 987-page draft of climate and energy legislation that they believe can win the support of 60 senators. “We are closer than we’ve ever been to a breakthrough,” said Kerry at the bill’s release. Notably absent, however, was their onetime Republican co-author, Lindsey Graham (SC), who walked away from the effort amid partisan wrangling over the legislative calendar. So, after all the delays and setbacks and suspense, what’s in the bill?

The draft is a complex attempt to balance competing demands. In a nod to environmentalists, it imposes some new restrictions on offshore drilling. And it retains the same key targets included in the House bill that passed last June: a 17 percent reduction of carbon emissions by 2020 and an 83 percent reduction by 2050. But in a move to please polluters, it establishes a slower phase-in of carbon regulations for many of the country’s biggest emitters. Utilities will be subject to carbon restrictions beginning in 2013, followed by manufacturers and other heavy emitters starting in 2016. The legislation also lavishes major financial incentives on coal, natural gas, and nuclear power.

Other key provisions, many demanded by industrial-state or moderate Democrats, include:

  • Heavy emitters that are especially energy intensive or vulnerable to international trade will also receive a significant number of free allowances to help them adjust to the carbon limits.
  • A so-called border adjustment—a tax on imports from countries that haven’t imposed restrictions on greenhouse gases. 
  • The Environmental Protection Agency would no longer have the authority to regulate carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act.
  • States would lose the ability to set their own carbon limits.
  • A firm “price collar”—an upper and lower limit on the price of carbon, which is intended to keep the market stable. The price of carbon permits will be set at a minimum of $12 per ton (increasing at 3 percent over inflation each year) and a maximum of $25 per ton (increasing at 5 percent over inflation annually).
  • Two-thirds of revenues generated by the sale of permits would be returned to consumers, either through direct rebates or in allocations to local distribution companies. Kerry promised Wednesday that the impact of the bill on consumers would be “very, very minimal.”
  • $54 billion in loan guarantees for up to 12 new nuclear reactors.
  • Free allowances for coal-fired power plants to help them cover the expense of developing technoology to capture and store carbon emissions. New coal plants permitted between 2009 and 2019 will be required to cut emissions by at least 50 percent; plants permitted in 2020 and beyond will be required to reduce emissions by at least 65 percent.

Kerry and Lieberman attempted to quell some of the outrage over offshore drilling by allowing states to opt out of lease sales off their coasts and veto drilling in neighboring states if it’s determined that a spill could harm their environment or economy. But the draft measure also includes revenue-sharing for states that allow drilling off their shores—which opponents believe provides an incentive for states to greenlight more drilling.

Industry groups who joined the senators at the roll-out included the Edison Electric Institute (the trade group representing utilities), Duke Energy, Dow Corning, Honeywell, Florida Power and Light, and the Nuclear Energy Institute. Environmental groups included the National Wildlife Federation, the Environmental Defense Fund, and Republicans for Environmental Protection. Military leaders and a representative from the National Association of Evangelicals were also on hand.

More on the bill to come shortly.

More MotherJones reporting on Climate Desk

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest