Greens Call on Senate to Take Drilling “Off the Table”

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

More than 70 state-based and national environmental groups called on the Senate Monday to keep any expansion of offshore oil and gas drilling out of energy and climate legislation. In light of the unfolding environmental catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico, the groups write, more drilling “should be off the table”:

Expanding exploration and drilling into previously protected and remote areas is unacceptable when it is clear that we are not capable of responding to oil spills in a timely manner. The Senate faces a choice between leading America forward in a new clean energy economy or holding America back by preserving the failed energy policies of the past.

The letter—signed by the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, League of Conservation Voters, Friends of the Earth, and Environment America, among others—marks a shift in the stance of some green groups, which were initially willing to accept limited drilling as part of a broader climate and energy legislation. Language in the bill (a draft of which was supposed to be introduced last week before it got caught up in political wrangling) concerning drilling was a contentious issue even before the scale of the Gulf disaster became clear. But the spill has prompted even more outrage among environmentalits, pushing groups that were orginally open to drilling concessions to outight opposition. 

Notably absent from the letter were several major enviro groups, including the Environmental Defense Fund and the National Wildlife Federation. EDF spokesman Tony Kreindler said the group is focusing on how to handle the immeadiate crisis at hand in the Gulf. The group is calling for “full scale intervention and emergency response, funding to restore wetlands, funding for fisherman and livelihoods, and passage of the clean energy and climate bill so we can start to get ourselves off oil.”

Joe Mendelson, director of global warming policy at the National Wildlife Federation, warned not to read to much into the fact that his group didn’t sign on in support. “I wouldn’t take our absence as a lack of comprehension or sympathy with that position,” he said. “We don’t know where the bill is at this point,” he continued, noting that it’s likely that the provisions that deal with offshore drilling and leasing “probably have to change to reflect the situation now.”

With the spill still getting worse, the politics of drilling and how they will play into the Senate climate debate will only get more interesting in the coming weeks.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend