Exploiting the Oil Spill: One Word—Lithium

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


In recent days, Rush Limbaugh and other rightwingers have accused the Obama administration and environmentalists of trying to exploit the BP oil spill for political gain—even suggesting that they caused the disaster or let the leak continue in order to undermine plans for expanding offshore drilling. This is wacko stuff, showing that the soundbite scoundrels of the right will exploit anything to score political points. But there are those on the right who are also trying to exploit the BP oil spill the old-fashioned way: for financial profit.

This morning I received an email from Townhall.com, a prominent conservative site that features the writings of well-known conservative pundits. The subject head: “Obama may cancel ALL oil drilling, wants Lithium. LTUM stock could triple.” Townhall had rented out its email list to a stockpicking newsletter that was pushing lithium stocks—and attempting to make a buck off the paranoid conservatives who soak up Limbaughian lies. Well, if  rightwingers really do believe that President Barack Obama will cancel all offshore drilling, then they ought to be easy marks for Townhall’s partner. They might also be interested in purchasing some swamp land in Florida.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest