Meg Whitman Snagged on Her Own Border Fence

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Meg Whitman, the GOP gubernatorial front-runner in California, apparently doesn’t watch her own exteremly expensive political ads. The former EBay CEO and billioniare insisted to Politico this week that her ads don’t contain shots of a border fence, then had to be corrected by her press secretary. The embarassing exchange has been the joke of the day on California’s political blogs. San Francisco Chronicle‘s Joe Garofili offered Whitman his first anual Rene Magritte award, named after the creator of the “Ceci n’est pas une pipe” painting. “Perhaps Meg was merely channeling Magritte in saying that there wasn’t a border fence in her ad,” he wrote. “It was an IMAGE of a border fence in her ad.”

Image of border fence in Whitman adImage of border fence in Whitman adOn the serious side, the exchange points to several potential liabilities for Whitman as she vies to lead the tarnished Golden State. She has a strong incentive to appeal to the anti-immigration sentiments of her GOP primary voters, who support Arizona’s draconian immigration crackdown. In this sense the border fence is a powerful code, but it also alienates Latinos, who make up 37 percent of the state’s population. To win in the general election, she’ll need to convince some 30 percent of the state’s Latinos to vote for her.

The gaffe also adds fuel to the sense that Whitman, who is worth $1.4 billion, is out of touch with the state and her own campaign. The $80 million that she’s already shelled out during the primary is a record for California, yet her more conservative primary opponent, Steve Poizner, has drastically closed on her in recent days (UPDATE: She’s widened the lead again). Given how many political ads Whitman has been running, it’s possible that she hasn’t been able to keep track of what they’re saying. That can’t be good for a candidate with a campaign theme of governmental accountability.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend