Poll: (Some) Tea Partiers Actually Like Obama

Flickr/<a href=http://www.flickr.com/photos/streetprotesttv/3956555851/" target="_blank">Street Protest TV</a> (Creative Commons)

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Earlier Nick Baumann highlighted the Winston Group’s new survey about the Tea Party, which revealed that Tea Partiers are largely old, white, male, andget this!conservative. No kidding. But taking a closer look at the Winston Group studyand a similar set of numbers released today by GallupI noticed something kind of funny: Considering the movement purports to counter the perceived “socialism” of his policies, President Obama is actually quite popular among the Tea Partiers. According to the Winston Group, 17 percent of Tea Partiers approve of the job Obama has been doing. Another 15 percent approve of the job Congressional Democrats have been doing, which, while not exactly a ringing endorsement, makes Democrats considerably more popular among Tea Partiers than Republicans. There’s a similar quirk in the Gallup poll: A whopping 12 percent of Tea Partiers believe the Affordable Care Act was a “good thing.” Merlin’s pants!

What could Tea Partiers possibly like about Obama? That’s the obvious mystery here, but I’m willing to speculate a little bit. Since much of the movement’s messaging is built on a steady flow of misinformation, it’s only natural that a lot of Tea Partiers are going to have difficulty sorting out the heroes and villains. For example: When I attended a Tea Party Express rally in Nevada last month, I spoke with a man who had come “to send a message to Harry Reid.” His grievance? He blamed Reid for shortchanging a proposal for a high-speed rail line from Las Vegas to Anaheim (instead, trains will stop in Victorville, California, 100 miles from LA, which admittedly is kind of lame). The Vegas-Anaheim line would have been great for Nevadans, he explained to me. And he was probably right. But that very idea was also lampooned by Republicans at the time as a “magnetic levitation line” from “Sin City” to “Disneyland.”

Showing up at a Tea Party seemed like an odd way to express support for European-style, subsidized public transit, but that’s kind of the point: Tea Party ringleaders have helped build the movement by confusing the heck out of everyone. On a much less cynical note, I’d add that for all the uncompromising rhetoric, even Tea Partiers can respectfully agree to disagree. At the same event in Searchlight, Nevada, I was approached by a middle-aged man sporting a Tea Party t-shirt and a Dale Earnhardt mustache. After listening in on a conversation, he followed me to my next interviewees. I was expecting a confrontation, but instead he told me “Mother Jones is a good magazine; I don’t agree with everything you guys do, but it’s very fair.”

That 17% of Tea Partiers who “approve” of Obama might not agree with him, but maybe some of them really do think he’s fair. And for what it’s worth, I find that encouraging.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend