Clean Tech Guru Fights California GHG Law

Flickr user Marcin Wichary

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


California has more than geeks and greenies to thank for its transformation into a clean tech Mecca; it’s also gotten a boost from the passage of AB32, the state’s landmark global warming law, say Silicon Valley’s tech leaders. Yesterday and today, many of these eco-execs have gathered at a clean technology conference held at the Silicon Valley campus of SRI International, an R&D and consulting firm that has earned its share of lucre from the green tech boom. But here’s one weird thing Silicon Valley might not know about SRI CEO Curtis Carlson: He has given money to a controversial campaign to derail AB32 that’s backed by major oil companies.

Last month, Carlson wrote a $5,000 check to the California Jobs Initiative Committee, the backer of a November ballot initiative that would prevent AB32 from going into effect until the state’s unemployment rate is cut in half. Other funders include Valero and six other oil companies, a coal front group, truckers, and the libertarian Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. They claim that AB 32 would cost the average small business in California $50,000, lead to the loss of 1.1 million jobs in the state, and “devastate the budgets of California social service agencies.” AB32’s supporters strongly disagree, pointing to competing studies that show the law would cost little and actually create jobs by incubating the kind of clean tech research that helped SRI earn nearly $500 million last year. SRI didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Carson’s opposition to AB32 is perplexing, to say the least. SRI is currently developing fuel cells, materials for solar cells, powerful batteries, and technologies for hydrogen storage, the smart grid, and nuclear power plants. It also earns money helping government agencies design environmental rules. “In the 1970s, our groundbreaking research into the environmental causes of lung disease led to regulatory guidelines for air pollution,” its website says. “In the 1980s, we demonstrated how chlorofluorocarbons contribute to the ozone hole, and developed protocols for the EPA’s regulation of pesticides.”

The conference that SRI is hosting this week, Nordic Green II, has attracted a who’s who of clean tech start-ups and investors, including Khosla Ventures, Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Better Place, and Google. The latter two, along with SRI, are members of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, which in turn is an official supporter of Stop the Texas Oil Companies’ Dirty Energy Proposition, the campaign against the campaign against AB32.

Rather than speculate on what Carson is thinking, I’ll leave you with this intriguing list of SRI’s business clients:

 

Akzo-Nobel Chemicals
Avery Dennison
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
California and Hawaii (C&H) Sugar
Certive Corporation
Charles Schwab & Co.
Chevron Corporation
Colin Medical Instruments
Conoco
CVS
Delphi Interiors
Drexler Technology
FedEx Corporation
Hitachi
Kajima
Kuraray
Leucadia Corporation
Mazda Corporation
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Monsanto
Ocean Spray
Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan Inc.
Playback Media
Samsung Corporation
Sanofi Winthrop
Taiho Pharmaceutical
Thames Water
Toray
Toyota
Tyco
VISA

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest