Afghan Police Training: “An Unbelievably Incompetent Story”

U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Dayton Mitchell.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Handing out Sen. Claire McCaskill’s prepared remarks Thursday afternoon as a hearing of her subcommittee on contracting oversight was about to get underway, the Missouri Democrat’s press secretary warned reporters that her boss might go “off the cuff.” Sure enough, after striding into the room and calling the session to order, McCaskill didn’t bother consulting her notes. She stared straight ahead at the witnesses before her and launched into a freestyle assault on police training efforts in Afghanistan. “It is an unbelievably incompetent story of contracting,” she said. “For 8 years we have been supposedly training the police in Afghanistan. And here’s what we’ve done. We’ve flushed six billion dollars. Six billion dollars!”

If only she were exaggerating. Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, who has been in charge of training Afghanistan’s security forces since November, informed Obama recently just how dire the situation is, according to a recent story co-published by Newsweek and ProPublica. “It’s inconceivable, but in fact for eight years we weren’t training the police,” he told the president. “We just never trained them before. All we did was give them a uniform.” 

Gordon Heddell, the Pentagon’s Inspector General, delivered a similar assessment to McCaskill’s committee. “Just about everything that could go wrong here has gone wrong,” he said, adding, “we have to start at the very beginning.”

For this startling failure, which directly threatens the Obama administration’s Afghanistan strategy and the president’s timetable for beginning the withdrawal of troops, there’s plenty of blame to go around. There’s DynCorp, the Virginia-based contractor that has been paid more than $1.2 billion since 2003 to train the Afghan police and whose services have been found sorely wanting by government audits. There’s the State Department, which was originally responsible for overseeing the police training contracts—a responsibility it failed to meet, at times having only three contracting officers on the ground. And then there’s the Pentagon, which eventually took control of the program, running it through an obscure military office and an existing contract vehicle that was only open to bids from five pre-selected contractors. DynCorp wasn’t one of them. The company lodged a protest, it won, and now the Afghan police training contract remains in limbo. This is bad news for the Obama adminstration and coalition forces, but it’s eve worsen for members of the Afghan police, who are dying in record rates.

As it stands, DynCorp’s contract has been extended until July while the Pentagon figures out its next move. David Sedney, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Central Asia, told the committee that his agency will hold a “full and open competition” for the training contract but he said the Pentagon had yet to fully formulate a plan to move the bidding process forward. (“That’s unacceptable,” McCaskill shot back.)

Heddell lamented any delay in installing a new contractor. “If we have to wait for a new contract, we’re not going to do very much… It needs to be fixed right now.” He added, “I’d hate to think we have to get a new contractor on board to start training police officials to survive.”

UPDATE: DynCorp weighs in on the hearing in a statement. Here’s part of it:

We offer a full and expanding set of services and programs to the United States Government around the world. We don’t make the policy, and we don’t set the strategy. We provide the people to help the United States Government execute foreign policy and national security objectives. We earn the privilege to do this work by winning head to head competitions with other contractors. One of the key criteria for winning work is past performance and our ability to consistently win new work is directly related to performing well on the contracts we already have. We welcome competitions and believe that the taxpayer receives best value through these head to head competitions.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend