Tea Partier Appears on Letterman

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


More proof the Tea Party movement is going mainstream: Last night, a member appeared on the Late Show with David Letterman.

The TV host decided to invite Pam Stout to his show after reading about her in a New York Times article, which described the president of the Sandpoint, Idaho Tea Party Patriots as an unlikely revolutionary with ties to the controversial Oath Keepers movement.

On stage, though, Stout seemed more like a matronly schoolteacher than an angry crackpot. In a mild-mannered voice, she recounted her work helping low-income residents get on their feet and owning her own business, and expressed a simple desire to “go back to the old ideals.” She even got the New York audience to erupt into applause a few times, as she questioned the government’s overspending and anti-business mentality.

It’s a pretty fascinating interview, and one that embodies a schism in a movement that has gone from fringe to political powerhouse seemingly overnight. While Tea Party rallies have garnered attention for their violently anti-Obama rhetoric and connections to people like Glenn Beck, members like Stout aren’t so much extremists as old-school conservatives.

Still, even Stout seems to have a radical streak. Besides her Oath Keepers connection, she gave credence to birther claims when Letterman broached the topic. And she repeatedly said her hero was James DeMint—the uber-conservative senator from South Carolina who played a role in Snowpocalypse and called health care reform Obama’s “Waterloo.”

But what millions of people saw last night was a downright likeable advocate for change during a time of growing unrest. I have no doubt her appearance will recruit more to the burgeoning Tea Party cause.

Watch all three parts of the video below:

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest