Idaho Bans Health Care Reform

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

On Wednesday, Idaho became the second in what promises to be a long list of states passing legislation that would “protect their citizens from being forced to purchase health insurance or participate in any health care system against their will,” according to a press release. The legislation, crafted by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), is an attempt to undermine any federal health care legislation by invoking the 10th Amendment and claiming that it prohibits the federal government from forcing states to implement the reform plan because the Constitution doesn’t say anything about health care. While all the rhetoric around such measures, which are pending in more than two-dozen other states, is about freedom from tyranny, state’s rights, etc., ALEC has a long history of serving as a front group for big corporations, particularly the tobacco industry. Legal experts don’t think the state legislation will hold up under court scrutiny, but the idea must be a tremendous fundraising tool for ALEC, which has long been able to gin up funding for unconstitutional and politically un-passable legislation to ban civil lawsuits against big corporations. No doubt it is awash in corporate health care money right now from companies duped into thinking this scheme might actually work. 

The open question about this latest round of state-level protests against health care reform, though, is how the states plan to enforce their legislation. I attended a “Tenth Amendment Summit” in Atlanta a few weeks ago that was attended by a bunch of state legislators, candidates like Alabama’s Ten Commandments judge Roy Moore, and various tea party types all pledging to promote a return to 10th Amendment purity. Many, if not most of them believe that states have the power to ignore federal laws they deem unconstitutional, and to use their National Guard troops to enforce that decision if necessary. Which made me wonder: If Idaho, home of the Ruby Ridge debacle in the 1990s, can’t stop federal health care reform, is the state preparing to take up arms to protect their citizens’ “right” to remain sick and uninsured? I guess weirder things have happened. More likely? Once the health care bill passes, Idaho residents will be clamoring to take advantage of its benefits and the state will quickly repeal the law in order to cash in on all the potential budget savings.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend