Murkowski’s EPA Block Gains More Dem Support

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) announed on the Senate floor on Thurday that she will seek to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases using an obscure parliamentary maneuver called a resolution of disapproval. Last month, the EPA finalized its finding that greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare, triggering regulation of these emissions under the Clean Air Act. Murkowski’s resolution would block the EPA from writing any such rules. Her effort has 35 GOP cosponsors and three Democratic cosponsors: Sens. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana. Democrat Jim Webb of Virginia has also expressed support.

In her speech, Murkowski protested what she called “back door climate regulations with no input from Congress.” The endangerment finding, she said, “is not merely a finding, it’s a floodgate” that would “wash over and further submerge our economy.” Lincoln issued a statement Thursday morning expressing concerns about the economic fallout of of EPA regulations, and instead proposed that the US reduce emissions by “bipartisan clean energy legislation produced by the Senate Energy Committee,” combined with energy tax incentives.

A resolution of disapproval needs only 51 votes to pass, and the Democratic support moves Murkowski closer to that number. Sill, advocates of climate legislation aren’t too concerned that her bill would actually become law—the House and the President would both likely reject it. But environmentalists are worried that if a bloc of Democrats votes to prevent EPA action on carbon emissions, this could damage the political prospects for a climate bill in the Senate later in the year.

Murkowski might not have the support of all Republicans in her effort, however. Maine Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins are notably not among the cosponsors. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is a cosponsor, but has also very publically supported passing legislation this year, and is working with John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) on a bill.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend