For Young Victoria, Second Time’s the Charm

Flickr/<a href="" target="_blank">koiart71</a> (<a href="" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a>)

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

How Victoria Fell in Love with Albert the Second Time She Met Him could well be an alternate title for The Young Victoria —in theaters Friday—a film that, despite pretenses of historical accuracy, is simply a love story. Whatever its faults, The Young Victoria proves that British actress Emily Blunt can carry a film: watching her smirk and simper for 104 minutes is entirely satisfying. You most likely remember Blunt as Miranda Priestly’s second-in-command in The Devil Wears Prada, and she was the most enjoyable thing about the nearly-unwatchable Sunshine Cleaning, despite the inexplicable presence of Alan Arkin. She’s also engaged to John Krasinski, better known as Jim from The Office

Despite the leading actress’s charms, the film’s dramatic tension relies largely on its viewers ignorance of British history, so it’s not surprising that some of The Young Victoria‘s loudest critics have been English. For one thing, knowing that Albert and Victoria eventually produced nine children makes it hard to get all misty-eyed when the prince takes a bullet for his newly pregnant wife. For another, Victoria and her husband had the misfortune of reigning during the birth of photography. Having glimpsed them in a textbook, viewers unfortunately do not likely imagine Prince Albert looking anything much like the excellent Rupert Friend. Nor do they imagine Victoria, who presided over the British Raj, Charles Dickens, and the Industrial Revolution, as looking at all like Emily Blunt, whose mischievous and malleable face seemed destined for indie films but made for period pieces. 


Critics have griped that the film is too much costume drama and too little politics, but they miss the point. That Victoria and her cousin Albert were rather aggressively arranged by King Leopold of Belgium would have put a damper on the whole romantic arc of the film if not for some deft handling by director Jean-Marc Vallée. To Vallée’s credit, he’s succeeded in making a love story that is sufficiently political and utterly romantic. Sure, one spends the last half of the movie expecting the end credits at any moment. But leaving aside the made-for-TV fades and some pretentious cinematography, I’d take the complicated (and consummated) romance of The Young Victoria over the limp but chaste romance of The Twilight Saga:New Moon any day. 

For those who still can’t imagine how Victoria and Albert’s courtship could manage to entertain for an hour and a half, consider Zadie Smith’s 2002 summary of their complex and ultimately doomed relationship. 

 “And now here are some facts. When Queen Victoria first met Albert she wasn’t really all that smitten. She was sixteen. He was her cousin. They got on well enough, but it was not what you would call a lightning/fireworks situation. Three years later, however, and suddenly he was right up her street. It was love at second sight. She was queen by then. It’s hard to tell whether that’s a significant fact in the story of How Victoria Fell in Love with Albert the Second Time She Met Him Rather Than the First Like Most People Would If They Were Intending to Fall in Love Suddenly. What can be said for sure is that after this second visit, Victoria describes Albert in her diary as “excessively handsome, such beautiful eyes…my heart is quite going,” and then proposes to him, which seems fairly fresh to us with our ideas about Victorians and how unfresh they were.”

–Zadie Smith, The Autograph Man



Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend