“Solar Roadmap” Moves to Full House

Giffords touring solar array at ASU. (Photo by Osha Gray Davidson)

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


The “Solar Roadmap” bill introduced by Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona (see our profile of Giffords and the bill) passed a House committee today and is headed for a vote in the full House.

On Monday, I traveled with Rep. Giffords as she toured solar installations at Arizona State University in Tempe. While talking about the Roadmap, HR 3585, Giffords stressed that it is a way to guide the development of solar power efficiently and effectively—but without picking winners and losers among competing technologies.

 

 

“Seventy-five percent of grants from the DOE will go through the Solar Roadmap Committee,” she said. “The panel members are there to ensure that the money is invested wisely.”

The 11-member committee will be comprised of a wide variety of experts from industry, national laboratories, academia, federal agencies and relevant state and local entities.

During the markup, I was surprised to hear several Republican members speak passionately about the need to adopt solar power. I’m not sure how that sentiment will translate into action on the full House floor, where GOP leaders have been successful at ramming the party line down members’ throats.

Still it was a fascinating debate in committee.

A low spot, followed by a high one. Low: When Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) likened the solar roadmap committee to Soviet central planning. The high spot came immediately afterwards when another Congressman rapped Rohranbacher’s knuckles for his Cold War rhetoric. The “rapper” was another Republican—Rep. Vernon Ehlers of Michigan.

It was a good day for solar—let’s hope it’s the first of many.

————-

Osha Gray Davidson is a contributing blogger at Mother Jones and publisher of The Phoenix Sun, an online news service reporting on solar energy. He tweets @thephoenixsun.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest