Mary Poppins, Lab Rat

by flick user obfusciatrist used under Creative Commons license

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

A spoonful of sugar it isn’t, but a biomedical breakthrough, urged on by none other than  74-year-old singer and actress Julie Andrews (aka Mary Poppins) may hold hope for thousands who’ve lost use of their vocal cords. 

Yes, science has developed yet another synthetic miracle to join titanium hips, pace-makers, and prosthetic robot hands. This time, it’s a gel form of polyethylene glycol—a key ingredient in skin creams and lubricants. Scientists believe the gel can mimic the larynx’s flaps of tissue which produce the human voice. They plan to start testing the gel on humans in two years.

Vocal cords, one might not be too surprised to learn, are alarmingly susceptible to damage. I still remember my distress when Chino Moreno (frontman for the Deftones) lost his primal scream to a vocal-cord injury and started putting out albums full of eerie art-noise instead.

Poor Julie Andrews isn’t putting out albums of notice, but she struggles to hold a note after a 1997 surgery to remove non-cancerous growths on her larynx left extensive scarring. Scientists at MIT and Harvard, working with the singer, hope the gel can restore her famous five-octave range.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend