Iran Nuclear Talks: Tehran Giving France the Silent Treatment?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

What do hawkish conservatives in the United States and the top officials of the Tehran regime have in common? Both groups don’t trust the French. Julian Borger, a reporter/editor for The Guardian, has been covering the multilateral talks in Vienna on Iran’s nuclear program, and he reports on his blog that Iran has been pushing to keep France out of the final deal:

Diplomats involved in the Vienna talks on the possible export and processing of Iran’s uranium have confirmed that Iran does not want France to be part of any formal agreement.

Their objection is based on their experience of being a 10% shareholder in a uranium enrichment plant in Drôme, Eurodif, that dates back to 1975 – the Shah era. The investment was made to provide Iran a steady supply of enriched uranium, but that supply has been denied to Iran under UN sanctions.

This is all history and the Iranians were well aware of it when they made an agreement in principle in Geneva on October 1, to send their low enriched uranium to Russia for further enrichment and then to France for fabrication into fuel for the Tehran research reactor. This may be more about punishing France for taking the toughest line on Iran in recent months.

The people I have been talking to say this is not a show-stopper. The formal agreement could be between Iran and Russia, and Russia could enter into a separate commercial arrangement with France, or the US could do the fuel fabrication….

Here at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, all the negotiating teams have left the chamber and are holding smaller group meetings in their allotted rooms downstairs. This, say the optimists here, is a good sign. It means the real work is being done. That may just be spin, but there are still plans for the IAEA director general, Mohamed ElBaradei to make some public closing remarks some time this afternoon.

In an update, Borger adds, “Work is underway on drafting an Iranian-Russian bilateral agreement, but it is still not clear whether that would be acceptable to the French and Americans.”

Imagine if progress is actually made in these negotiations. Then what will American hawks (like John Bolton, who recently seemed to have called for an Israeli nuclear strike on Iran) do? Look to France to block the deal?

You can follow David Corn’s postings and media appearances via Twitter.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend