Fatah Slams Obama. Where Does Abbas Stand?

Photo Courtesy of America.gov

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

As the adage says, if you’re a friend to everyone, you’re a friend to no one. This seemed to be confirmed Monday when Fatah, the moderate Palestinian political party that controls the West Bank, distributed a memo saying that its support for President Obama “evaporated” after he bent to pressure from the Zionist lobby. But since Obama also drew Israeli criticism in June for opposing Israel’s construction of settlements in Palestinian territories in a Cairo speech, the Fatah statement comes as a surprise. The dominance of the hard-line American Israel lobby has receded in recent years and President Obama is widely seen as more supportive of the Palestinian Authority than his predecessors. So why the ire?

Upon closer examination, Fatah’s statement says more about Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ political capital than it does about Obama’s leadership. As the AP writes, it is unclear whether Abbas was even involved with the memo:

The memo comes at a time of turmoil within Fatah after Abbas quickly reversed a decision to suspend efforts to bring Israel before a U.N. war crimes tribunal in connection with the Gaza war.

The document, dated Oct. 12, was issued by Fatah’s Office of Mobilization and Organization. The office is headed by the party’s No. 2, Mohammed Ghneim.

It was not immediately clear whether the document reflects Abbas’ views or whether it was leaked to pressure Obama to bear down harder on Israel. Abbas’ aides had no comment and Ghneim could not immediately be reached for comment.

Abbas has drawn criticism for working toward peace with the United States and Israel without demanding enough from his Israeli counterparts. This week, Lebanon’s Daily Star ran an editorial demanding that Abbas step down, and a youth group in the Gaza Strip held a mock trial, prosecuting Abbas for “betraying the blood of the martyrs and the injured.”

This is certainly a setback for the already-tenuous Middle East peace process. Middle Eastern news sources continue to suggest a possible Third Intifada. Will Abbas make a politically risky statement supporting Obama, or differ to Fatah hard-liners and distance the party from its best chance in decades to foster an American ally? Stay tuned.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend