Rick Scott’s Silly Ad

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Rick Scott, the former hospital conglomerate executive otherwise known as Public Option Enemy Number 1, has a great blog post up over at the Conservatives for Patients’ Rights blog. CPR, which Scott runs, has been buying television ads that he says “[chide] the President that neither his plan nor the plans of Congressional Democrats can guarantee Americans that:”

  • They can keep their current doctor
  • They won’t wait longer for care
  • Their health care won’t be rationed
  • They can keep the insurance plan they currently have

In Scott’s blog post, he very cleverly notes that the White House has not “called out” the ad for misrepresenting the Democrats’ health care plans. In his speech last week, President Obama promised to “call out” people who were misrepresenting the health care plan. Since the White House hasn’t “called out” CPR, Scott argues, the ad must be accurate.

Here’s the thing: the ad is accurate, in a way. “Guarantee” is the key word. Obama and the Democrats can’t guarantee any of those things. But that doesn’t actually mean anything. No one can guarantee those things. Scott’s argument against reform would be true of any bill.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest