G20 Expected to Move Forward on Cutting Fossil Fuel Subsidies

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


The Group of 20 will agree to phase out fossil fuel subsidies in the “medium term,” according to the most recent leaked draft of their communique. Leaders will also agree to “intensify our efforts” to reach a deal in Copenhagen at the end of the year, but, as expected, won’t offer any more specific commitments on climate.

The draft cites recent data from the International Energy Agency and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that finds that cutting these subsidies alone would likely reduce greenhouse gas emissions 10 percent by 2050. It directs the energy and finance ministers of the G20 nations to develop timelines and strategies for phasing out those subsidies:

“Inefficient fossil fuel subsidies encourage wasteful consumption, distort markets, impede investment in clean energy sources and undermine efforts to deal with climate change,” says the draft statement.

Leaders are also expected to direct their finance ministers to provide them with a survey of their options for financing climate change adaptation and mitigation in the poorest countries, and to reaffirm their desire to reach a deal on climate this year. “We underscore anew our resolve to take strong action to address the threat of dangerous climate change,” said the draft.

Perhaps the biggest development was Obama’s announcement on Friday that G20 would henceforward replace the G8 as the main economic council of the world’s wealthiest nations. While G8 has been composed of northern-hemisphere, historical powers, the G20 includes nations like China, Brazil, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa—rising economies that will play an increasingly important role in global decision-making. It reflects the movement to a more multi-polar world, and the new grouping  accounts for roughly 85 percent of global gross domestic product and, in turn, 85 percent of greenhouse gas emissions.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest