Rumsfeld: Pentagon Waste Caused by Excess Photocopiers

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

When Donald Rumsfeld became Secretary of Defense in 2001, he vowed to bring change to the Pentagon. If anything, he was harsher in his criticism of the DOD’s dysfunction than Gates and Obama are now. In a speech on September 10, 2001, Rumsfeld called the department’s bureaucracy “an adversary that poses a threat, a serious threat, to the security of the United States of America. In this building, despite this era of scarce resources taxed by mounting threats, money disappears into duplicative duties and bloated bureaucracy…”

Rumsfeld pledged to fix the DOD’s archaic accounting system—which had lost track of $2.3 trillion in transactions—to root out waste, and to fix a procurement system that routinely delivered expensive, outdated weapons programs. Unfortunately, things didn’t exactly work out that way. So what happened? Well, Bradley Graham’s new 600-plus-page opus on the life and works of Donald Rumsfeld provides a couple of intriguing clues.

Justin Elliot over at TPM picks up one interesting tidbit—that Rumsfeld may have been reluctant to cancel big weapons programs because of his own considerable financial stake in the defense sector. “Several of Rumsfeld’s associates saw the secretary’s inclination to put off big cuts early on as a direct result of his own financial situation,” Graham writes. Before arriving at the Pentagon, Rumsfeld was supposed to divest himself of the interests in his $50-$210 million portfolio that did business with the DOD. “But the divesture process was going slowly because a considerable amount of Rumsfeld’s wealth was in private partnerships and closely held corporations that were difficult to sell. Under the circumstances, Rumsfeld told associates he was hesitant to take significant action on defense acquistion programs.”

On at least one occasion, Rumsfeld simply dropped the ball on his ambitious promises. Take his pledge to fix the department’s woeful accounting practices. He set up a council of senior advisers to oversee reform and counter the parochialism of the services.  But according to Graham, Rumsfeld never showed up for a single meeting of the council, and so all the talk of reform went nowhere.

Or maybe Rumsfeld was just plain clueless. At one point, Rumsfeld is grilling an underling about how to trim $45 billion from a budget plan and remarks, “There’s so much waste in this department. I saw a guy who had two copying machines.” Suffice to say that in the annals of Pentagon waste, superfluous photocopiers don’t rank very high on the list.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend