Bailout Watchdogs to the Rescue?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

What’s worrisome about the bailout repayments is that banks might buy back their government-held warrants on the cheap. If the ten big banks that have been in the headlines this week after the Treasury announced they could pay their way out of TARP get discounts like multiple smaller banks before them, taxpayers will be on the losing end…again.

But there’s good news: Two bailout watchdogs, the Special Inspector General for TARP (SIGTARP) and the Congressional Oversight Panel, announced today in a letter to the Senate that they intend to zero in on the sale of warrants in order to protect taxpayers and shed some much needed light on these transactions.


According to the letter, the Congressional Oversight Panel has begun an analysis to estimate “a reasonable range of values” for the warrants. (Valuing these warrants fairly is key to maximizing returns to taxpayers—something the Treasury hasn’t done that well to date.) The COP and Special Inspector General will then use these values to scrutinize the Treasury’s negotiation process as it sells its warrants back to banks. The results, the letter said, will come out with the panel’s July monthly report.

But will it be too little too late? Last month, Treasury Secretary Geithner said he wanted to sell the warrants “as quickly as we can.” Geithner added, “What I’m reluctant to do is have the government be in a position where we hold these investments for a long period of time, longer than is desirable, in the hopes that we’re going to maximize value.” 

It’s not entirely up to Geithner though. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the law that created the bailout, says the Treasury must do all it can to maximize returns to taxpayers. And in this case, that means wait. Even skeptical economists like Paul Krugman predict that the U.S. could emerge from the current recession by the fall, so Geithner won’t have to wait long. Hopefully with oversight from these watchdogs and a little bit of patience, taxpayers will finally get a fair deal.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend