Battling the Low-Tech Boom

America’s anti-IED strategy pits million-dollar technology against garage door openers.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS, improvised explosive devices, the tactic of choice for Iraqi insurgents, have spread to the Afghan roadside in a big way: At last count, IEDs accounted for more than 70 percent of US combat casualties in Iraq and half of those in Afghanistan. Since 2003, according to Pentagon documents, the Army’s Joint IED Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) and its predecessors have spent $14 billion trying to do what JIEDDO’s name implies, including $2.3 billion for high-tech countermeasures “to thwart simple, cheap triggering devices such as two-way radios or garage door openers.”

In Afghanistan, the pricey gear has helped coalition troops find and clear nearly three times as many bombs in 2008 as in 2006. But the insurgents have kept pace: Casualties from IEDs have increased by nearly the same margin. As for whether the money might not be better spent on, say, humanitarian and development efforts, the IED chasers note that US forces will now likely face this guerrilla tactic wherever they go. “IEDs are a weapon,” notes JIEDDO’s 2008 report to Congress. “They are not the enemy.”

Typical IED CellTypical IED Cell

  • A financier pays for explosives and cheap electronics
  • A bomb builder makes the devices
  • An emplacer hides the bombs
  • A spotter watches for the approach of military targets
  • A triggerman detonates IEDs using devices like cell phones or garage-door openers
  • A cameraman tapes the mayhem for online recruitment

How the Military Fights BackHow the Military Fights Back

  • Warrior Alpha aerial surveillance spies on suspected bomb makers at a cost of $242 million
  • Talon robots and thermal cams suss out IEDs and shady characters
  • Rhino predetonation units ($59 million all told) blow up IEDs from afar
  • Wolf Collar gear (a $67 million initiative) rakes up IED trigger wires
  • Hunter and Chameleon jammers blindly thwart IED electronics
  • Dog teams sniff around for hidden bombs
  • Husky device (developed for $33.1 million) detects buried explosives
  • Truck-mounted “interrogator” arms ($216,500 a pop) probe IEDs
  • Frag 5 Humvee-armor kits help protect personnel


IEDs in Afghanistan

Collateral Damage

Drone air strikes reported since 2007: 40

Civilians they’ve killed: about 200

Wedding parties obliterated by US air raids: at least 2

Total civilians killed in 2008 during Afghan combat: 2,118

Increase over 2007: 39%


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend