Michael Steele, Really Bumbling Through This Specter Situation

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Michael Steele and the RNC sent out an email to supporters late last night trying to raise funds on Specter’s switch. “His defection to the Democrat Party puts the Democrats in an almost unstoppable position to pass Obama’s destructive agenda,” he wrote. “Join me in this fight by making a secure online contribution of $25, $50, $100, $500 or $1,000 right now.” For good measure, he calls Specter “craven” and Obama backers a “band of radical leftists.”

My favorite bit, though, is when he follows up that name-calling by comparing the RNC and its supporters to America’s greatest statesman.

Some will use Specter’s defection as an excuse to fold the tent and give up. I believe that you are not one of those people. When Benedict Arnold defected to the British, George Washington didn’t fold the tent and give up either.

What’s a little self-flattery among friends? Steele also said yesterday that Specter, who is basically a moderate conservative, has a “left-wing” voting record. Which is a pretty clear signal that, oh, 70 percent of Americans and their political views aren’t welcome in today’s GOP. Nice work, Chairman Steele!

Update: Uh oh. Looks like Steele is facing dissent in-house.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest