Report: FDA Ignores Safety Regs, Risks Lives

Photo from flickr user <a href="" target="blank">1987porsche944 (Infinite recursion)</a> used under a Creative Commons license

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

From last year’s outbreak of salmonella-tainted tomatoes, to an internal analysis (PDF) warning the agency can’t adequately regulate new medical devices or protect the safety of the nation’s food supply, all the bad publicity the Food and Drug Administration has earned in the last two years revealed an agency plagued by lack of funding and incompetence.

A report released Wednesday by Project on Government Oversight, a Washington-based watchdog group, adds another item to the list of bad ink for the FDA, this one a product of downright negligence.

POGO alleges the Food and Drug Administration deliberately disregarded regulations governing non-clinical tests of medical devices such as defibrillators, pacemakers and stents.

According to the report, officials at the Center for Devices and Radiological Health decided not to subject certain devices to the rigorous testing outlined by the Good Laboratory Practice regulation, which ensures the accuracy and integrity of safety data submitted to the FDA. Why? It isn’t quite clear. GLP testing can be costly and lengthy. According to the whistle-blowers (PDF) who contacted POGO, employees were pressured to overlook any false data submitted by device manufacturers who didn’t subject their products to GLP oversight.

An excerpt from one letter sent to POGO by an anonymous FDA staffer:

There is mandatory indoctrination of employees to overlook fraud and omissions in applications. Also incentives (bonuses, outstanding appraisals, and public recognition) reinforce this behavior.

And another:

Irresponsible management, supervisors, and team leaders have put corporate interests above public safety and undermine the health and lives of American citizens. The world does not know about the government’s ineptitude in the review of medical and radiological devices.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend