Men’s Health Worst Foods: Healthy List or Sneaky Ad?

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Image by flickr user Matt NichollsFrom Men’s Health magazine comes a list of the worst foods in America of 2009. By “worst” Men’s Health
means worst for your body; by “food” the magazine means products or
menu items. The list is basically a catalog of the fattest prepared
foods in America.

Topping said list is Baskin Robbins’ infamous Large Chocolate Oreo
Shake, which with 2,600 calories (about 400 more calories than I consume in a day)
and 263 grams of sugar (that’s equal to about 18 cupcakes), is
essentially a heart attack in a disposable cup. Ian Froeb at the St.
Louis Riverfront Times tried the Oreo Shake last month and found the taste and color somewhat wanting:

For all those calories, the Chocolate Oreo Shake’s texture
is kinda thin. It certainly lacks the lung-draining thickness of a
classic soda-fountain shake. And all that crumbled up cookie gives it a
grainy feel. A colleague astutely compared it to a protein smoothie
loaded with whey powder.

Other gems from the Men’s Health list include the 2,000 calorie Chili’s Smokehouse Bacon Triple-The-Cheese Big Mouth Burger with Jalapeno Ranch Dressing, and the Quarter-Pounder-equivalent Romano’s Macaroni Grill Dessert Ravioli.

The list is sort of compelling in an
oh-my-God-how-can-people-eat-that-crap kind of way, but something’s a
little odd about the 20 worst foods in America. They’re part of the
magazine’s “Eat This, Not That” campaign (and $19.95 accompanying
book), so each fat bomb is shown with another, slightly less fattening,
food twin. The book is published by Rodale Press, which also owns Men’s Health.

While it does make sense to encourage people to make healthier
eating choices, the whole project is derailed by encouraging Americans
to eat other prepared foods. And, melodrama aside, it’s not the Baskin
Robbins Large Chocolate Oreo Shake that’s responsible for American
obesity. As this recent article in the New York Times about The Biggest Loser shows, the problem is that Americans rely too much on prepared foods.

Even if home cooking is of the
fried-chicken-and-mashed-potatoes variety, it rarely produces extreme
obesity, said Barry Popkin, a nutritional epidemiologist at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “Almost any kind of
cooking you can produce in a kitchen is healthier than fast food.” The
decline of home cooking worldwide, he said, is an underlying cause of
obesity.

“People are eating more, and more often,” Dr. Popkin said.
“And the foods that they are consuming almost always replace meals
cooked in a kitchen and eaten at a table.” It is difficult to quantify
a decline in cooking skills, but many studies show that time in the
kitchen has declined steeply since 1965, when American women spent a
weekly average of 13 hours cooking.

The Men’s Health article is amusing to read, but it fails to address the underlying problem. If you’re really trying to eat healthier, the Prime Minister’s Prime Rib is not going to save you.

—Daniel Luzer

Image by flickr user Matt Nicholls

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest