Livni or Netanyahu? Israeli Prime Minister TBD by Radical Lieberman (Not That One)

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

After Israel’s  tight election for prime minister Kadima Party moderate Tzipi Livni is now just ahead of right-wing Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahu (with 28 vs. 27 seats in the Knesset). But the real power sits with rising radical Avigdor Liebermanan ultra-conservative who wants to establish a blanket denial of all Arabs for citizenshipwho can throw his support to either to determine who becomes prime minister. (He said he’s open to talking with both but will no doubt side with fellow hard-liner Netanyahu.)

This is not good news.It’s not good for anyone. Jews and non-Jews, Israelis and non-, and bad not only for those who want to see a just, fair, and reasoned outcome, because what is just is relative, but for anyone who don’t want to live, and have their kids live, in a war-ravaged country where their disenfranchised enemies have nowhere else to go, nothing else to turn to, than radical suicide-bombing, missile-firing jihad.

A Livni government would have meant a new approach to Israel’s Palestine Problem. Namely, she promised to get rid of the illegal settlements metastasizing throughout the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. (The settlement population grew at 120% the rate of the Israeli population in 2007, and construction accelerated last year.) Under Netanyahu, settlements will continue to grow; Lieberman lives on a settlement. Which means impossible navigation for Palestinians, and shrinking options for a people now in the midst of their own (you’re free to object in the comments), holocaust.

Livni also strongly favors a two-state solution, a sentiment shared shared by Barack Obama, and one he’s going to have a bear of a time working out with Netanyahu in office and radicals ruling the day.

Godspeed, Mr. President.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend