Grammy Preview: M.I.A. About to Pop, Radiohead On the March?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

While it’s understandable if you’re a cynic about the usually-preposterous Grammy Awards, Sunday night’s show actually promises some nail-biting races and some dramatic, “will-they-or-won’t-they” performances. First of all, singer M.I.A., up for Record of the Year for “Paper Planes,” is scheduled to perform, despite the fact that she is very, very preggers. In fact, tomorrow Sunday is apparently her due date, if you can believe it. Will her wee Arulpragasam pop out right at the “ka-ching” noise in “Planes,” or will an early arrival force her to cancel? Also upping the drama quotient is Radiohead, who are not scheduled to perform (and have never performed at the Grammys), but rumors are flying all the way to Pitchfork, who seem to believe the Brit combo will play In Rainbows‘ jazzy, drum-led 5/4 opener “15 Step” accompanied by the USC marching band. Hooray Radiohead, but ugh, marching bands—they’re so, you know, “Hollaback Girl.” Pitchfork also holds out hope for a Kanye/Radiohead mashup performance, which would make me pleased for Earworm but sad for myself, since it’s long been a secret wish to see, for instance, Liam Gallagher wander out on to the Grammys stage for a surprise duet with Green Day—even if I don’t get a shout-out.

MTV already made some predictions about who will win (Coldplay, yes; Lil Wayne, nope) but I suppose I can try my hand at calling what the wrinkled old geezers in the Recording Academy will vote for without ever having heard it. My predictions in a few categories after the jump.Record of the Year
Adele – “Chasing Pavements”
Coldplay – “Viva la Vida”
Leona Lewis – “Bleeding Love”
M.I.A. – “Paper Planes” (Should win, 50% chance will win)
Robert Plant & Alison Krauss – “Please Read the Letter” (50% chance will win)

Coldplay would have been a shoo-in for this one, but the Satriani thing (and general negative reviews) has almost assuredly affected Grammy voters’ opinions, legitimately or not. M.I.A.’s stock is rising fast (especially with Slumdog the seemingly unstoppable Oscar juggernaut), but I’m not sure she can pull it off, and it was for a stoner movie before that, which Academy voters probably haven’t forgotten. Adele and Lewis are too light (and cancel each other out), leaving Plant & Krauss as the type of thing Grammy loves to love: dull-as-toast, industry-veteran, medium-level commercial success. I’d say it’s a tossup.

Album of the Year
Coldplay – Viva La Vida Or Death And All His Friends
Lil Wayne – Tha Carter III
Ne-Yo – Year Of The Gentleman
Robert Plant & Alison Krauss – Raising Sand
Radiohead – In Rainbows (Should win, will win)

Another tough category. Wayne has critical acclaim and massive sales, but swears a lot, and is also a rapper, although if he doesn’t win, the Academy faces (more) accusations of racism. Radiohead have critical acclaim and industry-changing accolades, but is their pay-what-you-want screw-the-labels approach something the Recording Academy wants to reward? And does all that mean Robert Plant & Alison Krauss will sneak up from behind as Wayne and Radiohead split the vote? I’ll give it to Radiohead, but just barely.

Song of the Year
Estelle – American Boy
Adele – Chasing Pavements
Jason Mraz – I’m Yours
Sara Bareilles – Love Song
Coldplay – Viva La Vida

God, who cares?!


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend