GAO: Treasury’s Vision for TARP is “Unclear”

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The Government Accountability Office has just released its second report [PDF] on the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, and the troubling key takeaway is this: Treasury’s “strategic vision for TARP remains unclear.” Uh-oh. At present, TARP is the primary mechanism for ensuring the nation’s economy doesn’t entirely collapse. In other words, having more than an ad hoc plan for spending billions of taxpayer money needed to happen, like, yesterday.

With trademark understatedness, the GAO explains the problem:

[E]arly on Treasury outlined a strategy and approach to purchase whole loans and mortgage-backed securities from financial institutions, but changed direction to making capital investments in qualifying financial institutions as the global community opted to move in this direction. Moreover, once Treasury determined that capital infusions were preferable to purchasing whole mortgages and mortgage-backed securities, Treasury did not clearly articulate how the various programs (such CPP, SSFI, and TIP) would work collectively to help stabilize financial markets.

There’s more:

Other actions have raised additional questions about Treasury’s strategy. First, the funding of the first institution to receive funding under TIP [Targeted Investment Program] was announced weeks before the program was established. Similarly, the Asset Guarantee Program was established after Treasury announced that it would guarantee assets under such a program, and many of the details of the program have yet to be worked out. Second, Treasury’s efforts to mitigate residential foreclosures, which have contributed to increased volatility in financial markets, remain in the design phase with no clearly articulated strategy. Finally, while Treasury has continued to publicly report on individual issues, testify, and make speeches about the program, it continues to struggle to convey a clearly articulated and overarching message about its efforts, potentially hampering TARP’s effectiveness and underscoring ongoing questions about its communication strategy. Without a clearly articulated strategic vision, Treasury’s effectiveness in helping to stabilize markets may be hampered.

The GAO notes that Treasury has made some progress on the transparency front since it released its last report in early December, finding that the program was desperately in need of oversight. But the inescapable (and scary) conclusion here is that the agency is still flying by the seat of its pants. It literally can’t explain what its TARP strategy even is, let alone how it’s going to help get us out of this mess.

At least the GAO is looking over Treasury’s shoulder. And its auditors could soon be granted enhanced oversight authority. Earlier this week, Senators Max Baucus and Chuck Grassley, the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, respectively, introduced a bill that would give the GAO access to the records of bailout recipients when it conducts regular reviews of the TARP program.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend