Will a Western Gross National Happiness Index Catch On?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Below is a guest blog entry by Hong Kong-based journalist Don Duncan.

In Buddhist Bhutan, it is common wisdom that every creation requires destruction. That’s hearteningly optimistic for the Western economists who descended on the tiny country for the international Gross National Happiness Conference last week.

Gross National Happiness, or GNH, requires that advances be made on nine key fronts in order for national progress to be achieve—education, health, culture, community vitality, living standards, psychological wellbeing, the ecology, and balanced time use. All government policy making in Bhutan is guided by these principles.

During the high capitalism of Reaganomics, Thatcherism and, more recently, free market fundamentalism, the doctrine met with incredulity and derision. Even if you can define national happiness, how on earth can you measure it?

Realizing that Gross National Happiness doesn’t stand a chance on the international marketplace of economic ideas without an index to measure it, Bhutan has gone and devised one. Much like GDP, the GNH Index is a figure comparable across nations and through time. Survey results on no less than 72 aspects of living in a given country are put through a complex set of algorithms to arrive at the single number. “Defining happiness for everyone is not what is important,” says Dasho Karma Ura, president of the Center for Bhutan Studies. “What is important is providing the conditions through which people can achieve happiness as they understand it.”

The idea is catching on. Last week, the narrow, hilly streets of the country’s capital, Thimphu, were littered with foreign economists, educators, and public policy consultants, all trying to solve for the world’s new economic reality.

“Here you have developing countries [like Bhutan], challenging what the best way is to go about development,” says Jon Hall of the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

On the Western front, projects like the Canadian Index on Wellbeing and State of the USA both make use of ideas founded in Bhutan, which can be explored now on the website Grossnationalhappiness.com, launched in Thimphu.

But perhaps the most significant GNH-style project of all is in France. The Quality of Life Commission, initiated by President Sarkozy and helmed by economic heavyweights Joseph Stiglitz and Armatya Sen, will launch with its finding and recommendations next year. The commission’s work promises to move policy from the singular logic of profitability to the plural logic of GNH—not only in France, but throughout the European Union.

And in America? President-elect Barack Obama is definitely seen as like-minded by at least one Bhutanese. “Obama is using the same vocabularies,” says Dasho Karma Ura. “He wants to bring health care back, wants to improve education, environmental responsibility…We are basically talking about the same things.”

Don Duncan is a freelance journalist based in Hong Kong. Research assistance provided by the Investigative Fund of the Nation Institute.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend